天空彩票app技巧|天空彩票app登录

来源：天空彩票app娱乐2024-02-12 17:48

推动中国同中亚国家关系高水平发展（和音）******

　　中国同中亚五国实现“三个全覆盖”——全面战略伙伴关系全覆盖、双边层面践行人类命运共同体全覆盖、签署共建“一带一路”合作文件全覆盖，将为携手构建更加紧密的中国—中亚命运共同体注入重要动力

　　日前，习近平主席在人民大会堂同来华进行国事访问的土库曼斯坦总统谢尔达尔·别尔德穆哈梅多夫举行会谈。两国元首宣布将中土关系提升为全面战略伙伴关系，就推动构建中土命运共同体达成重要共识，并共同见证签署“一带一路”等领域合作文件。这标志着中国同中亚五国实现了“三个全覆盖”，即全面战略伙伴关系全覆盖、双边层面践行人类命运共同体全覆盖、签署共建“一带一路”合作文件全覆盖。

　　中土两国理念相通，目标相似，利益相连。在两国元首的战略引领下，中土各领域多层次交流合作取得丰硕成果，友好关系日益巩固。中土建立全面战略伙伴关系，持续深化全方位合作，推动构建中土命运共同体，将使两国关系在更高水平上向前发展。中土构建命运共同体是在彼此尊重、坦诚互信、互利共赢的基础上，更好地深化互利合作、照顾彼此关切、巩固世代友好。双方要在彼此核心利益问题上相互支持，尊重各自走符合本国国情的发展道路；加快发展战略对接，充分发挥中土合作委员会等机制作用，不断拓展合作的广度和深度，用实实在在的合作成果为两国关系提供支撑；深化执法安全、生物安全合作，共同打击“三股势力”，筑牢维护两国发展的安全屏障；加强各领域各层级交流，开展人文合作，深化人民感情，筑牢两国关系持续健康发展的民意和社会基础。这些有利于两国实现发展振兴，为两国人民创造更多福祉。

　　中土关系进一步提升，体现了中国同中亚国家关系的高水平发展。31年前，中国率先同中亚国家建交，开启了双方交往和合作的大门。31年来，双方走出了一条睦邻友好、合作共赢的新路，成为构建新型国际关系的典范。习近平主席去年1月在中国同中亚五国建交30周年视频峰会上指出：“无论国际风云如何变幻，无论未来中国发展到什么程度，中国都始终是中亚国家值得信任和倚重的好邻居、好伙伴、好朋友、好兄弟。”中国同中亚五国分别建立全面战略伙伴关系，在双边层面践行人类命运共同体，有助于维护地区和平稳定与发展繁荣。作为中国同中亚国家开展合作的新机制，“中国+中亚五国”合作机制公开透明、互利共赢、平等互惠、务实管用，为深化中国同中亚国家全方位合作提供了重要平台。办好首届“中国+中亚五国”峰会，将充分发挥元首外交引领作用，推动中国同中亚国家关系实现新发展，助力双方更好应对共同挑战。

　　中亚地区是“一带一路”的首倡之地。中国同中亚国家秉持共商共建共享原则，推动“一带一路”倡议在中亚地区开花结果，为地区人民带来了实实在在的福祉。中国—中亚天然气管道是世界上最长的天然气管道，截至2022年6月累计对华输气超4000亿立方米；乌兹别克斯坦“安格连—帕普”铁路隧道贯通，彻底改变了上千万人的出行方式；中哈霍尔果斯国际边境合作中心与中哈连云港物流合作基地成功建成，打开了中亚国家通向太平洋的大门；中吉乌公路正式通车，成为跨越高山、畅通无阻的国际运输大动脉……在“一带一路”倡议与中亚国家发展战略对接框架内，中国同中亚国家合作取得一系列历史性、标志性、突破性成就。双方继续高质量共建“一带一路”，加快发展战略对接，将更好促进本地区经济发展、人民福祉、睦邻互信。

　　亲望亲好，邻望邻好。中国坚持亲诚惠容和与邻为善、以邻为伴周边外交方针，深化同周边国家友好互信和利益融合。中国与中亚国家赓续友谊、推进合作，携手构建更加紧密的中国—中亚命运共同体，必将为推动构建人类命运共同体作出更大贡献。

天空彩票app技巧

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.